Which of the following is not a type of research design commonly used in evidence-based practice?

The correct choice highlights that book reviews do not constitute a research design commonly utilized in evidence-based practice. In evidence-based practice, research designs are systematic approaches used to collect and analyze data with the aim of answering specific research questions, ultimately contributing to the body of knowledge in a field.

Randomized controlled trials, cohort studies, and systematic reviews are well-established research designs. Randomized controlled trials are considered the gold standard in clinical research due to their ability to reduce bias and establish causality by randomly assigning participants to different treatment groups. Cohort studies involve following a group of individuals over time to observe outcomes related to certain exposures or interventions, thus providing valuable longitudinal data. Systematic reviews synthesize existing research findings on a particular topic, critically appraising the evidence from multiple studies to draw comprehensive conclusions.

In contrast, book reviews do not involve original research or systematic analysis and are often summarizations or critiques of previously published literature rather than an empirical investigation. As such, while they can provide valuable insights, they do not fit the framework of defined research designs specifically aimed at generating new evidence or assessing interventions in a structured manner.