What is one consequence of relying on non-experimental studies?

One consequence of relying on non-experimental studies is indeed the limited generalizability of findings. Non-experimental studies often lack the robust control of extraneous variables that experimental designs offer. As a result, the findings from non-experimental studies may be more context-specific and may not easily translate to different populations or settings. This limitation arises because non-experimental studies, such as observational research or surveys, may be influenced by various confounding factors that are not controlled for, leading to conclusions that may not hold true in broader or varying circumstances.

In contrast, the ability to determine causality typically requires experimental designs where manipulation of variables and randomization can establish clearer cause-and-effect relationships. Increased funding opportunities may be more aligned with experimental or innovative studies that hold greater potential for impact. Elaborate methodological frameworks are often highlighted in research literature but do not directly pertain to the consequence of non-experimental studies, as these frameworks can be applied across different research designs. Therefore, the limited generalizability is a significant consideration when evaluating the implications of non-experimental research.